[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220607164916.215711033@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 19:01:54 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, liuyacan <liuyacan@...p.netease.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 257/452] net/smc: postpone sk_refcnt increment in connect()
From: liuyacan <liuyacan@...p.netease.com>
[ Upstream commit 75c1edf23b95a9c66923d9269d8e86e4dbde151f ]
Same trigger condition as commit 86434744. When setsockopt runs
in parallel to a connect(), and switch the socket into fallback
mode. Then the sk_refcnt is incremented in smc_connect(), but
its state stay in SMC_INIT (NOT SMC_ACTIVE). This cause the
corresponding sk_refcnt decrement in __smc_release() will not be
performed.
Fixes: 86434744fedf ("net/smc: add fallback check to connect()")
Signed-off-by: liuyacan <liuyacan@...p.netease.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 35db3260e8d5..5d7710dd9514 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1118,9 +1118,9 @@ static int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
if (rc && rc != -EINPROGRESS)
goto out;
- sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
if (smc->use_fallback)
goto out;
+ sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
if (flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
if (queue_work(smc_hs_wq, &smc->connect_work))
smc->connect_nonblock = 1;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists