linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 443/452] bfq: Remove pointless bfq_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220607164921.768178714@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  7 Jun 2022 19:05:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 443/452] bfq: Remove pointless bfq_init_rq() calls

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit 5f550ede5edf846ecc0067be1ba80514e6fe7f8e upstream.

We call bfq_init_rq() from request merging functions where requests we
get should have already gone through bfq_init_rq() during insert and
anyway we want to do anything only if the request is already tracked by
BFQ. So replace calls to bfq_init_rq() with RQ_BFQQ() instead to simply
skip requests untracked by BFQ. We move bfq_init_rq() call in
bfq_insert_request() a bit earlier to cover request merging and thus
can transfer FIFO position in case of a merge.

CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-6-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -2267,8 +2267,6 @@ static int bfq_request_merge(struct requ
 	return ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE;
 }
 
-static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq);
-
 static void bfq_request_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
 			       enum elv_merge type)
 {
@@ -2277,7 +2275,7 @@ static void bfq_request_merged(struct re
 	    blk_rq_pos(req) <
 	    blk_rq_pos(container_of(rb_prev(&req->rb_node),
 				    struct request, rb_node))) {
-		struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_init_rq(req);
+		struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(req);
 		struct bfq_data *bfqd;
 		struct request *prev, *next_rq;
 
@@ -2329,8 +2327,8 @@ static void bfq_request_merged(struct re
 static void bfq_requests_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
 				struct request *next)
 {
-	struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq),
-		*next_bfqq = bfq_init_rq(next);
+	struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq),
+		*next_bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(next);
 
 	if (!bfqq)
 		return;
@@ -5518,6 +5516,8 @@ static inline void bfq_update_insert_sta
 					   unsigned int cmd_flags) {}
 #endif /* CONFIG_BFQ_CGROUP_DEBUG */
 
+static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq);
+
 static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
 			       bool at_head)
 {
@@ -5532,6 +5532,7 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct bl
 		bfqg_stats_update_legacy_io(q, rq);
 #endif
 	spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
+	bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq);
 	if (blk_mq_sched_try_insert_merge(q, rq)) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
 		return;
@@ -5539,7 +5540,6 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct bl
 
 	blk_mq_sched_request_inserted(rq);
 
-	bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq);
 	if (!bfqq || at_head || blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq)) {
 		if (at_head)
 			list_add(&rq->queuelist, &bfqd->dispatch);