linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220607065749.GA1513445@chaop.bj.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:57:49 +0800
From:   Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        "Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
        ddutile@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, mhocko@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM
 guest private memory

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 01:09:50PM -0700, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
> >
> > Private memory map/unmap and conversion
> > ---------------------------------------
> > Userspace's map/unmap operations are done by fallocate() ioctl on the
> > backing store fd.
> >   - map: default fallocate() with mode=0.
> >   - unmap: fallocate() with FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE.
> > The map/unmap will trigger above memfile_notifier_ops to let KVM map/unmap
> > secondary MMU page tables.
> >
> ....
> >    QEMU: https://github.com/chao-p/qemu/tree/privmem-v6
> >
> > An example QEMU command line for TDX test:
> > -object tdx-guest,id=tdx \
> > -object memory-backend-memfd-private,id=ram1,size=2G \
> > -machine q35,kvm-type=tdx,pic=no,kernel_irqchip=split,memory-encryption=tdx,memory-backend=ram1
> >
> 
> There should be more discussion around double allocation scenarios
> when using the private fd approach. A malicious guest or buggy
> userspace VMM can cause physical memory getting allocated for both
> shared (memory accessible from host) and private fds backing the guest
> memory.
> Userspace VMM will need to unback the shared guest memory while
> handling the conversion from shared to private in order to prevent
> double allocation even with malicious guests or bugs in userspace VMM.

I don't know how malicious guest can cause that. The initial design of
this serie is to put the private/shared memory into two different
address spaces and gives usersapce VMM the flexibility to convert
between the two. It can choose respect the guest conversion request or
not.

It's possible for a usrspace VMM to cause double allocation if it fails
to call the unback operation during the conversion, this may be a bug
or not. Double allocation may not be a wrong thing, even in conception.
At least TDX allows you to use half shared half private in guest, means
both shared/private can be effective. Unbacking the memory is just the
current QEMU implementation choice.

Chao
> 
> Options to unback shared guest memory seem to be:
> 1) madvise(.., MADV_DONTNEED/MADV_REMOVE) - This option won't stop
> kernel from backing the shared memory on subsequent write accesses
> 2) fallocate(..., FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE...) - For file backed shared
> guest memory, this option still is similar to madvice since this would
> still allow shared memory to get backed on write accesses
> 3) munmap - This would give away the contiguous virtual memory region
> reservation with holes in the guest backing memory, which might make
> guest memory management difficult.
> 4) mprotect(... PROT_NONE) - This would keep the virtual memory
> address range backing the guest memory preserved
> 
> ram_block_discard_range_fd from reference implementation:
> https://github.com/chao-p/qemu/tree/privmem-v6 seems to be relying on
> fallocate/madvise.
> 
> Any thoughts/suggestions around better ways to unback the shared
> memory in order to avoid double allocation scenarios?
> 
> Regards,
> Vishal