[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220607180011.481266-3-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:59:38 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 03/34] lkdtm/usercopy: Expand size of "out of frame" object
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
[ Upstream commit f387e86d3a74407bdd9c5815820ac9d060962840 ]
To be sufficiently out of range for the usercopy test to see the lifetime
mismatch, expand the size of the "bad" buffer, which will let it be
beyond current_stack_pointer regardless of stack growth direction.
Paired with the recent addition of stack depth checking under
CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y, this will correctly start tripping again.
Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/762faf1b-0443-5ddf-4430-44a20cf2ec4d@collabora.com/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c
index e172719dd86d..4617c63b1026 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c
@@ -30,12 +30,12 @@ static const unsigned char test_text[] = "This is a test.\n";
*/
static noinline unsigned char *trick_compiler(unsigned char *stack)
{
- return stack + 0;
+ return stack + unconst;
}
static noinline unsigned char *do_usercopy_stack_callee(int value)
{
- unsigned char buf[32];
+ unsigned char buf[128];
int i;
/* Exercise stack to avoid everything living in registers. */
@@ -43,7 +43,12 @@ static noinline unsigned char *do_usercopy_stack_callee(int value)
buf[i] = value & 0xff;
}
- return trick_compiler(buf);
+ /*
+ * Put the target buffer in the middle of stack allocation
+ * so that we don't step on future stack users regardless
+ * of stack growth direction.
+ */
+ return trick_compiler(&buf[(128/2)-32]);
}
static noinline void do_usercopy_stack(bool to_user, bool bad_frame)
@@ -66,6 +71,12 @@ static noinline void do_usercopy_stack(bool to_user, bool bad_frame)
bad_stack -= sizeof(unsigned long);
}
+#ifdef ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER
+ pr_info("stack : %px\n", (void *)current_stack_pointer);
+#endif
+ pr_info("good_stack: %px-%px\n", good_stack, good_stack + sizeof(good_stack));
+ pr_info("bad_stack : %px-%px\n", bad_stack, bad_stack + sizeof(good_stack));
+
user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0);
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists