[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220607164951.465057716@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 19:03:44 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 559/667] s390/perf: obtain sie_block from the right address
From: Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
commit c9bfb460c3e4da2462e16b0f0b200990b36b1dd2 upstream.
Since commit 1179f170b6f0 ("s390: fix fpu restore in entry.S"), the
sie_block pointer is located at empty1[1], but in sie_block() it was
taken from empty1[0].
This leads to a random pointer being dereferenced, possibly causing
system crash.
This problem can be observed when running a simple guest with an endless
loop and recording the cpu-clock event:
sudo perf kvm --guestvmlinux=<guestkernel> --guest top -e cpu-clock
With this fix, the correct guest address is shown.
Fixes: 1179f170b6f0 ("s390: fix fpu restore in entry.S")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Acked-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_bl
if (!stack)
return NULL;
- return (struct kvm_s390_sie_block *) stack->empty1[0];
+ return (struct kvm_s390_sie_block *)stack->empty1[1];
}
static bool is_in_guest(struct pt_regs *regs)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists