[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yp8D5o0swyqETiDS@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:53:10 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, npiggin@...il.com, urezki@...il.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: ioremap: rename ioremap_page_range() to
ioremap_range()
On 06/06/22 at 10:27pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:39:09PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Because the current ioremap_page_range() only maps IO address to kernel
> > virtual address, no struct page pointer passed in or page handling related.
> > So rename it here.
> >
> > The renaming is done with below command:
> > sed -i "s/ioremap_page_range/ioremap_range/g" `git grep -l ioremap_page_range`
>
> This creates a lot of churn without much of a benefit. If you want
> to get rid of the name please convert most architectures to the
> generioc ioremap code first so that all these callers go away..
Thanks for checking.
Yeah, I didn't manually adjust those indentation after replacing via
command. While the name of ioremap_page_range() is misleading, relative
to its implementation.
Converting to use generic ioremap code on most of architectures sounds
like a good idea, just like what the arm/arm64 converting patchset is
doing. From a quick look, not all places can take the converting, and
there's one in pci_remap_iospace() under drivers. So what I need to do
is to:
1)take back this pach;
2)convert as many architectures to the generic ioremap code as possible;
3)rename the left places of ioremap_page_range() to ioremap_range().
Please check if this is what you are suggesting.
Thanks
Baoquan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists