lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220607165011.360823569@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  7 Jun 2022 19:05:50 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 758/772] list: test: Add a test for list_is_head()

From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

commit 37dc573c0a547e1aed0c9abb480fab797bd3833f upstream.

list_is_head() was added recently[1], and didn't have a KUnit test. The
implementation is trivial, so it's not a particularly exciting test, but
it'd be nice to get back to full coverage of the list functions.

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/include/linux/list.h?id=0425473037db40d9e322631f2d4dc6ef51f97e88

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 lib/list-test.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

--- a/lib/list-test.c
+++ b/lib/list-test.c
@@ -234,6 +234,24 @@ static void list_test_list_bulk_move_tai
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 2);
 }
 
+static void list_test_list_is_head(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct list_head a, b, c;
+
+	/* Two lists: [a] -> b, [c] */
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&a);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&c);
+	list_add_tail(&b, &a);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE_MSG(test, list_is_head(&a, &a),
+		"Head element of same list");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(test, list_is_head(&a, &b),
+		"Non-head element of same list");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(test, list_is_head(&a, &c),
+		"Head element of different list");
+}
+
+
 static void list_test_list_is_first(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct list_head a, b;
@@ -710,6 +728,7 @@ static struct kunit_case list_test_cases
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_move),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_move_tail),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_bulk_move_tail),
+	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_is_head),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_is_first),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_is_last),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_empty),


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ