[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rJif3ydZuFJcSjPxkGMofZkbu2PXcHBF23OWVgGQ4c+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:51:41 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt()
Hi Phil,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:47 AM Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response, but that doesn't work for me either. Let me say
> again that I'm on a downstream kernel (rpi-5.15.y) so this may not be a
> universal problem, but merging either of these fixing patches would be fatal for us.
Alright, thanks. And I'm guessing you don't currently have a problem
*without* either of the fixing patches, because your device tree
doesn't use rng-seed. Is that right?
In anycase, I sent in a revert to get all the static branch stuff out
of stable -- https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220607084005.666059-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/
-- so the "urgency" of this should decrease and we can fix this as
normal during the 5.19 cycle. But with that said, I do want to get
this fixed as soon as possible still. I'll be back at my desk tonight
and will finally have access to real hardware again. Are you hitting
this by loading a 32bit kernel on a raspi4? Or running a 32bit kernel
on the raspi1? Or some other combo?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists