linux-kernel - Re: [next] arm64: boot failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYve1faH7AmpEa-p_ySb_WCgc4DdjqyS6fSdiJYsaEi=rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:57:52 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Raghuram Thammiraju <raghuram.thammiraju@....com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Vasily Averin <vvs@...nvz.org>,
        Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [next] arm64: boot failed - next-20220606

Hi Shakeel,

> > > Can you test v5.19-rc1, please?  If that does not fail, then you could
> > > bisect between that and next-20220606 ...
> > >
> >
> > This is already reported at
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yp4F6n2Ie32re7Ed@qian/ and I think we know
> > the underlying issue (which is calling virt_to_page() on a vmalloc
> > address).
>
> Sorry, I might be wrong. Just checked the stacktrace again and it
> seems like the failure is happening in early boot in this report.
> Though the error "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
> address" is happening in the function mem_cgroup_from_obj().
>
> Naresh, can you repro the issue if you revert the patch "net: set
> proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations"?

yes. You are right !
19ee3818b7c6 ("net: set proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations")
After reverting this single commit I am able to boot arm64 successfully.

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org