[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yp8/g0m0xWiRmOq9@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:07:31 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: 20220515233047.531979-3-chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, kostap@...vell.com,
robert.marko@...tura.hr, vadym.kochan@...ision.eu,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] arm64: dts: marvell: Add Armada 98DX2530 SoC and
RD-AC5X board
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:49:36PM +0300, Vadym Kochan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile | 1 +
> > .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-98dx25xx.dtsi | 297 ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-98dx35xx-rd.dts | 101 ++++++
> > .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-98dx35xx.dtsi | 13 +
>
> There is a proposal from the Marvell to replace "armada-" prefix to "ac5-" in DTS naming as there
> is no much common with Armada SoC's.
O.K. We can do this. But i hope it is not Marvell being lazy.
I can also see an advantage of using armada-, since it makes it clear
we are talking about mainline device tree files, not Marvell vendor
device tree files. It is not given they will be compatible.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists