[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74fdda90-f015-5cb9-a2d2-137baf090c59@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:42:33 +0000
From: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jiangshanlai@...il.com" <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>, "brgerst@...il.com" <brgerst@...il.com>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: 5.19-rc1 x86 build failure
On 07/06/2022 13:19, Joe Damato wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> My apologies if this is the incorrect place to report this, but I got a
> build error when trying to compile the net-next 5.19-rc1 tree.
>
> git bisect says that commit a1e2c031ec394 ("x86/mm: Simplify
> RESERVE_BRK()") is responsible for the build issue I am hitting.
>
> I am performing this build on an x86_64 system with GNU C11 (Ubuntu
> 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.12) version 5.4.0 20160609 (x86_64-linux-gnu).
>
> The assembler outputs a cryptic error message:
>
> /tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:98: Error: missing ')'
> /tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:98: Error: missing ')'
> /tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:98: Error: missing ')'
> /tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:98: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
> character is `U'
> /tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:99: Error: missing ')'
> /tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:99: Error: missing ')'
> /tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:99: Error: missing ')'
> /tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:99: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
> character is `U'
>
> I've asked GCC to generate the assembly and output so I can see more
> specifically where this issue is (via "-fverbose-asm -Wa,-adhln=output"):
>
> 96 .pushsection .brk_reservation,"aw",@nobits
> 97 .brk.early_pgt_alloc:
> 98 ???? 00000000 .skip ((2 * 3) * ((1UL) << 12))
> **** Error: missing ')'
> **** Error: missing ')'
> **** Error: missing ')'
> **** Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `U'
> 98 0000
> 100 .popsection
>
> This comes from arch/x86/mm/init.c, which has the following code:
>
> RESERVE_BRK(early_pgt_alloc, INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE);
>
> wherein INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE (via PAGE_SIZE) has a "1UL" which makes the
> assembler unhappy.
>
> I don't really know what the correct way to fix this is; it seems that the
> macro _AC should handle this if ASSEMBLY is defined, IIUC, but that does
> not seem to be the case at this point in init.c.
>
> Perhaps I am doing something incorrect during the build process causing
> this to happen?
The problem is that _AC() is evaluated in C context (so gains the UL/ULL
suffix), and the C'd string is fed directly into the assembler (where
older binutils doesn't tolerate the suffix).
Short of having a _PAGE_SIZE which is an explicitly non-AC()'d constant,
I'm not sure what to suggest. Ideally, you'd want to temporarily define
__ASSEMBLY__ around the expansion of __stringify(), but I don't think
that's possible as RESERVE_BRK() is a macro itself.
~Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists