linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] bitops: define gen_test_bit() the same way as the rest of functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yp9WFREfdfkho0hm@elver.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:43:49 +0200
From:   Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
        Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] bitops: define gen_test_bit() the same way as the
 rest of functions

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 01:49PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Currently, the generic test_bit() function is defined as a one-liner
> and in case with constant bitmaps the compiler is unable to optimize
> it to a constant. At the same time, gen_test_and_*_bit() are being
> optimized pretty good.
> Define gen_test_bit() the same way as they are defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h
> index 7a60adfa6e7d..202d8a3b40e1 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h
> @@ -118,7 +118,11 @@ gen___test_and_change_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
>  static __always_inline int
>  gen_test_bit(unsigned int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr)
>  {
> -	return 1UL & (addr[BIT_WORD(nr)] >> (nr & (BITS_PER_LONG-1)));
> +	const unsigned long *p = (const unsigned long *)addr + BIT_WORD(nr);
> +	unsigned long mask = BIT_MASK(nr);
> +	unsigned long val = *p;
> +
> +	return !!(val & mask);

Unfortunately this makes the dereference of 'addr' non-volatile, and
effectively weakens test_bit() to the point where I'd no longer consider
it atomic. Per atomic_bitops.txt, test_bit() is atomic.

The generic version has been using a volatile access to make it atomic
(akin to generic READ_ONCE() casting to volatile). The volatile is also
the reason the compiler can't optimize much, because volatile forces a
real memory access.

Yes, confusingly, test_bit() lives in non-atomic.h, and this had caused
confusion before, but the decision was made that moving it will cause
headaches for ppc so it was left alone:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/87a78xgu8o.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net/T/#u

As for how to make test_bit() more compiler-optimization friendly, I'm
guessing that test_bit() needs some special casing where even the
generic arch_test_bit() is different from the gen_test_bit().
gen_test_bit() should probably assert that whatever it is called with
can actually be evaluated at compile-time so it is never accidentally
used otherwise.

I would also propose adding a comment close to the deref that test_bit()
is atomic and the deref needs to remain volatile, so future people will
not try to do the same optimization.

Thanks,
-- Marco