linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: xfrm: unexport __init-annotated xfrm4_protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Jun 2022 07:39:39 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: xfrm: unexport __init-annotated
 xfrm4_protocol_init()

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:18:32PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-06-06 at 13:53 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL and __init is a bad combination because the .init.text
> > section is freed up after the initialization. Hence, modules cannot
> > use symbols annotated __init. The access to a freed symbol may end up
> > with kernel panic.
> > 
> > modpost used to detect it, but it has been broken for a decade.
> > 
> > Recently, I fixed modpost so it started to warn it again, then this
> > showed up in linux-next builds.
> > 
> > There are two ways to fix it:
> > 
> >   - Remove __init
> >   - Remove EXPORT_SYMBOL
> > 
> > I chose the latter for this case because the only in-tree call-site,
> > net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c is never compiled as modular.
> > (CONFIG_XFRM is boolean)
> > 
> > Fixes: 2f32b51b609f ("xfrm: Introduce xfrm_input_afinfo to access the the callbacks properly")
> > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> 
> @Steffen: are you ok if we take this one in the -net tree directly?
> Otherwise a repost would probably be the better option, with this patch
> stand-alone targeting the ipsec tree and the other 2 targeting -net.

Yes, just take it.

Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>

Thanks!