| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:18:00 +0800
From: Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@...ux.ibm.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/7] mm/demotion: Expose per node memory tier to
sysfs
On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 17:55 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> From: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Add support to read/write the memory tierindex for a NUMA node.
>
> /sys/devices/system/node/nodeN/memtier
>
> where N = node id
>
> When read, It list the memory tier that the node belongs to.
>
> When written, the kernel moves the node into the specified
> memory tier, the tier assignment of all other nodes are not
> affected.
>
> If the memory tier does not exist, writing to the above file
> create the tier and assign the NUMA node to that tier.
>
> mutex memory_tier_lock is introduced to protect memory tier
> related chanegs as it can happen from sysfs as well on hot
> plug events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 35 ++++++++++++++
> include/linux/migrate.h | 4 +-
> mm/migrate.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index ec8bb24a5a22..cf4a58446d8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/swap.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/migrate.h>
>
>
>
>
> static struct bus_type node_subsys = {
> .name = "node",
> @@ -560,11 +561,45 @@ static ssize_t node_read_distance(struct device *dev,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(distance, 0444, node_read_distance, NULL);
>
>
>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY
> +static ssize_t memtier_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + int node = dev->id;
> +
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", node_get_memory_tier(node));
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t memtier_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + unsigned long tier;
> + int node = dev->id;
> +
> + int ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &tier);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = node_reset_memory_tier(node, tier);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(memtier);
> +#endif
> +
> static struct attribute *node_dev_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_meminfo.attr,
> &dev_attr_numastat.attr,
> &dev_attr_distance.attr,
> &dev_attr_vmstat.attr,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY
> + &dev_attr_memtier.attr,
> +#endif
> NULL
> };
>
>
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> index 0ec653623565..d37d1d5dee82 100644
> --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> @@ -177,13 +177,15 @@ enum memory_tier_type {
> };
>
>
>
>
> int next_demotion_node(int node);
> -
> extern void migrate_on_reclaim_init(void);
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> extern void set_migration_target_nodes(void);
> #else
> static inline void set_migration_target_nodes(void) {}
> #endif
> +int node_get_memory_tier(int node);
> +int node_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier);
> +int node_reset_memory_tier(int node, int tier);
> #else
> #define numa_demotion_enabled false
> static inline int next_demotion_node(int node)
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index f28ee93fb017..304559ba3372 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -2132,6 +2132,7 @@ static struct bus_type memory_tier_subsys = {
> .dev_name = "memtier",
> };
>
>
>
>
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(memory_tier_lock);
> static struct memory_tier *memory_tiers[MAX_MEMORY_TIERS];
>
>
>
>
> static ssize_t nodelist_show(struct device *dev,
> @@ -2225,6 +2226,108 @@ static const struct attribute_group *memory_tier_attr_groups[] = {
> NULL,
> };
>
>
>
>
> +static int __node_get_memory_tier(int node)
> +{
> + int tier;
> +
> + for (tier = 0; tier < MAX_MEMORY_TIERS; tier++) {
> + if (memory_tiers[tier] && node_isset(node, memory_tiers[tier]->nodelist))
> + return tier;
> + }
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +int node_get_memory_tier(int node)
> +{
> + int tier;
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure memory tier is not unregistered
> + * while it is being read.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> +
> + tier = __node_get_memory_tier(node);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> +
> + return tier;
> +}
> +
> +int __node_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + /*
> + * As register_memory_tier() for new tier can fail,
> + * try it before modifying existing tier. register
> + * tier makes tier visible in sysfs.
> + */
> + if (!memory_tiers[tier]) {
> + ret = register_memory_tier(tier);
> + if (ret) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + node_set(node, memory_tiers[tier]->nodelist);
> +
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int node_reset_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
I think "reset" isn't a good name here. Maybe something like "change"
or "move"?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> +{
> + int current_tier, ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> +
> + current_tier = __node_get_memory_tier(node);
> + if (current_tier == tier)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (current_tier != -1 )
> + node_clear(node, memory_tiers[current_tier]->nodelist);
> +
> + ret = __node_set_memory_tier(node, tier);
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + if (nodes_empty(memory_tiers[current_tier]->nodelist))
> + unregister_memory_tier(current_tier);
> + } else {
> + /* reset it back to older tier */
> + ret = __node_set_memory_tier(node, current_tier);
> + }
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int node_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
> +{
> + int current_tier, ret = 0;
> +
> + if (tier >= MAX_MEMORY_TIERS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + current_tier = __node_get_memory_tier(node);
> + /*
> + * if node is already part of the tier proceed with the
> + * current tier value, because we might want to establish
> + * new migration paths now. The node might be added to a tier
> + * before it was made part of N_MEMORY, hence estabilish_migration_targets
> + * will have skipped this node.
> + */
> + if (current_tier != -1)
> + tier = current_tier;
> + ret = __node_set_memory_tier(node, tier);
> + mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * node_demotion[] example:
> *
Powered by blists - more mailing lists