lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:33:59 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, broonie@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
        qperret@...gle.com, tabba@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com,
        tjmercier@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Keir Fraser <keirf@...gle.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: Add hypervisor overflow stack

On Tue, 07 Jun 2022 17:50:45 +0100,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> Allocate and switch to 16-byte aligned secondary stack on overflow. This
> provides us stack space to better handle overflows; and is used in
> a subsequent patch to dump the hypervisor stacktrace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 +++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S | 9 ++-------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index a84e38d41d38..f346b4c66f1c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -242,4 +242,7 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
>  
>  	unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
>  }
> +#else /* __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [PAGE_SIZE/sizeof(long)], overflow_stack)
> +	__aligned(16);

Does this need to be a whole page? With 64kB pages, this is
potentially a lot of memory for something that will hardly ever be
used. The rest of the kernel limits this to 4kB, which seems more
reasonable. There is no guard page anyway, so PAGE_SIZE doesn't
provide any extra protection.

>  #endif /* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S
> index ea6a397b64a6..4e3032a244e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S
> @@ -177,13 +177,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(__host_hvc)
>  	b	hyp_panic
>  
>  .L__hyp_sp_overflow\@:
> -	/*
> -	 * Reset SP to the top of the stack, to allow handling the hyp_panic.
> -	 * This corrupts the stack but is ok, since we won't be attempting
> -	 * any unwinding here.
> -	 */
> -	ldr_this_cpu	x0, kvm_init_params + NVHE_INIT_STACK_HYP_VA, x1
> -	mov	sp, x0
> +	/* Switch to the overflow stack */
> +	adr_this_cpu sp, overflow_stack + PAGE_SIZE, x0
>  
>  	b	hyp_panic_bad_stack
>  	ASM_BUG()
> -- 
> 2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
> 
> 

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ