| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f74a6310-a50c-ebd6-cf06-df90fb02dd64@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 13:55:28 +0530
From: Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@...ux.ibm.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/7] mm/demotion: Expose per node memory tier to
sysfs
On 6/8/22 12:48 PM, Ying Huang wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 17:55 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> From: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Add support to read/write the memory tierindex for a NUMA node.
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/node/nodeN/memtier
>>
>> where N = node id
>>
>> When read, It list the memory tier that the node belongs to.
>>
>> When written, the kernel moves the node into the specified
>> memory tier, the tier assignment of all other nodes are not
>> affected.
>>
>> If the memory tier does not exist, writing to the above file
>> create the tier and assign the NUMA node to that tier.
>>
>> mutex memory_tier_lock is introduced to protect memory tier
>> related chanegs as it can happen from sysfs as well on hot
>> plug events.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/node.c | 35 ++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/migrate.h | 4 +-
>> mm/migrate.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
>> index ec8bb24a5a22..cf4a58446d8c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> #include <linux/swap.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/migrate.h>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> static struct bus_type node_subsys = {
>> .name = "node",
>> @@ -560,11 +561,45 @@ static ssize_t node_read_distance(struct device *dev,
>> }
>> static DEVICE_ATTR(distance, 0444, node_read_distance, NULL);
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY
>> +static ssize_t memtier_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + int node = dev->id;
>> +
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", node_get_memory_tier(node));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t memtier_store(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long tier;
>> + int node = dev->id;
>> +
>> + int ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &tier);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = node_reset_memory_tier(node, tier);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(memtier);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static struct attribute *node_dev_attrs[] = {
>> &dev_attr_meminfo.attr,
>> &dev_attr_numastat.attr,
>> &dev_attr_distance.attr,
>> &dev_attr_vmstat.attr,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY
>> + &dev_attr_memtier.attr,
>> +#endif
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
>> index 0ec653623565..d37d1d5dee82 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
>> @@ -177,13 +177,15 @@ enum memory_tier_type {
>> };
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> int next_demotion_node(int node);
>> -
>> extern void migrate_on_reclaim_init(void);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> extern void set_migration_target_nodes(void);
>> #else
>> static inline void set_migration_target_nodes(void) {}
>> #endif
>> +int node_get_memory_tier(int node);
>> +int node_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier);
>> +int node_reset_memory_tier(int node, int tier);
>> #else
>> #define numa_demotion_enabled false
>> static inline int next_demotion_node(int node)
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index f28ee93fb017..304559ba3372 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -2132,6 +2132,7 @@ static struct bus_type memory_tier_subsys = {
>> .dev_name = "memtier",
>> };
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> +DEFINE_MUTEX(memory_tier_lock);
>> static struct memory_tier *memory_tiers[MAX_MEMORY_TIERS];
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> static ssize_t nodelist_show(struct device *dev,
>> @@ -2225,6 +2226,108 @@ static const struct attribute_group *memory_tier_attr_groups[] = {
>> NULL,
>> };
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> +static int __node_get_memory_tier(int node)
>> +{
>> + int tier;
>> +
>> + for (tier = 0; tier < MAX_MEMORY_TIERS; tier++) {
>> + if (memory_tiers[tier] && node_isset(node, memory_tiers[tier]->nodelist))
>> + return tier;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int node_get_memory_tier(int node)
>> +{
>> + int tier;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Make sure memory tier is not unregistered
>> + * while it is being read.
>> + */
>> + mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
>> +
>> + tier = __node_get_memory_tier(node);
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
>> +
>> + return tier;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __node_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + /*
>> + * As register_memory_tier() for new tier can fail,
>> + * try it before modifying existing tier. register
>> + * tier makes tier visible in sysfs.
>> + */
>> + if (!memory_tiers[tier]) {
>> + ret = register_memory_tier(tier);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + node_set(node, memory_tiers[tier]->nodelist);
>> +
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int node_reset_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
>
> I think "reset" isn't a good name here. Maybe something like "change"
> or "move"?
>
how about node_update_memory_tier()?
-aneesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists