[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220608121253.867333-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:12:51 -0400
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86: wean fast IN from emulator_pio_in
Now that __emulator_pio_in already fills "val" for in-kernel PIO, it
is both simpler and clearer not to use emulator_pio_in.
Use the appropriate function in kvm_fast_pio_in and complete_fast_pio_in,
respectively __emulator_pio_in and complete_emulator_pio_in.
emulator_pio_in_emulated is now the last caller of emulator_pio_in.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 3b641cd2ff6f..aefcc71a7040 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -8692,11 +8692,7 @@ static int complete_fast_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* For size less than 4 we merge, else we zero extend */
val = (vcpu->arch.pio.size < 4) ? kvm_rax_read(vcpu) : 0;
- /*
- * Since vcpu->arch.pio.count == 1 let emulator_pio_in perform
- * the copy and tracing
- */
- emulator_pio_in(vcpu, vcpu->arch.pio.size, vcpu->arch.pio.port, &val, 1);
+ complete_emulator_pio_in(vcpu, &val);
kvm_rax_write(vcpu, val);
return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
@@ -8711,7 +8707,7 @@ static int kvm_fast_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
/* For size less than 4 we merge, else we zero extend */
val = (size < 4) ? kvm_rax_read(vcpu) : 0;
- ret = emulator_pio_in(vcpu, size, port, &val, 1);
+ ret = __emulator_pio_in(vcpu, size, port, &val, 1);
if (ret) {
kvm_rax_write(vcpu, val);
return ret;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists