linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 10/21] vfio/pci: introduce CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ac5cd90a-c92b-1bad-fbec-d1ca6287e826@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jun 2022 09:15:46 -0400
From:   Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        svens@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com,
        imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, vneethv@...ux.ibm.com,
        oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net, jgg@...dia.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/21] vfio/pci: introduce CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM

On 6/8/22 2:19 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06/06/2022 22.33, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> The current contents of vfio-pci-zdev are today only useful in a KVM
>> environment; let's tie everything currently under vfio-pci-zdev to
>> this Kconfig statement and require KVM in this case, reducing complexity
>> (e.g. symbol lookups).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig      | 11 +++++++++++
>>   drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile     |  2 +-
>>   include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h |  2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig
>> index 4da1914425e1..f9d0c908e738 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig
>> @@ -44,6 +44,17 @@ config VFIO_PCI_IGD
>>         To enable Intel IGD assignment through vfio-pci, say Y.
>>   endif
>> +config VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM
>> +    bool "VFIO PCI extensions for s390x KVM passthrough"
>> +    depends on S390 && KVM
>> +    default y
>> +    help
>> +      Support s390x-specific extensions to enable support for 
>> enhancements
>> +      to KVM passthrough capabilities, such as interpretive execution of
>> +      zPCI instructions.
>> +
>> +      To enable s390x KVM vfio-pci extensions, say Y.
> 
> Is it still possible to disable CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM ? Looking at 
> the later patches (e.g. 20/21 where you call kvm_s390_pci_zpci_op() from 
> kvm-s390.c), it rather seems to me that it currently cannot be disabled 
> independently (as long as KVM is enabled).

Yes, you can build with, for example, CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM=n and 
CONFIG_KVM=m -- I tested it again just now.  The result is kvm and 
vfio-pci are built and vfio-pci works, but none of the vfio-pci-zdev 
extensions are available (including zPCI interpretation).

This is accomplished via the placement of some IS_ENABLED checks.  Some 
calls (e.g. AEN init) are fenced by 
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM).  There are also some areas that 
are fenced off via a call to kvm_s390_pci_interp_allowed() which also 
includes an IS_ENABLED check along with checks for facility and cpu id.

Using patch 20 as an example, KVM_CAP_S390_ZPCI_OP will always be 
reported as unavailable to userspace if CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM=n due 
to the call to kvm_s390_pci_interp_allowed().  If userspace sends us the 
ioctl anyway, we will return -EINVAL because there is again a 
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM) check before we read the ioctl args 
from userspace.

> 
> So if you want to make this selectable by the user, I think you have to 
> put some more #ifdefs in the following patches.
> But if this was not meant to be selectable by the user, I think it 
> should not get a help text and rather be selected by the KVM switch in 
> arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig instead of having a "default y".
> 
>   Thomas
>