linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-binding: mfd: Add Richtek RT5120 PMIC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yp+gtJju1H+j88lE@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 20:02:12 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     cy_huang <u0084500@...il.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, cy_huang@...htek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-binding: mfd: Add Richtek RT5120 PMIC support

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:52:38PM +0800, cy_huang wrote:

> +  richtek,enable-undervolt-hiccup:
> +    type: boolean
> +    description: |
> +      If used, under voltage protection trigger hiccup behavior, else latchup as
> +      default
> +
> +  richtek,enable-overvolt-hiccup:
> +    type: boolean
> +    description:
> +      Like as 'enable-uv-hiccup', it configures over voltage protection to
> +      hiccup, else latchup as default

Why would we not want to have these enabled?  Unless there's some cost
to having them on it seems safer and more helpful to look for problems
with regulation all the time, it might help debug a system.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)