[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABXOdTcg0mThL_rgNWtAs4izk8mWUiQ4+86TpKF8VhvgL3+1sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 09:14:19 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
"open list:CHROME HARDWARE PLATFORM SUPPORT"
<chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/23] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit test
for getting legacy info
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:08 AM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> cros_ec_get_proto_info_legacy() expects to receive
> sizeof(struct ec_response_hello) from send_command(). The payload is
> valid only if the return value is positive.
>
> Add a Kunit test for returning 0 from send_command() in
> cros_ec_get_proto_info_legacy().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
> ---
> No v2. New and separated from the original series.
>
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
> index 8e47cb70dc8b..63071af81c94 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
> @@ -751,6 +751,54 @@ static void cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_legacy_data_error(struct kunit *test)
> }
> }
>
> +static void cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_legacy_return0(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct cros_ec_proto_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
> + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = &priv->ec_dev;
> + struct ec_xfer_mock *mock;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* For cros_ec_get_proto_info() without passthru. */
> + {
> + mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_addx(test, 0, EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + /* For cros_ec_get_proto_info_legacy(). */
> + {
> + mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_add(test, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_pretest(test);
> + ret = cros_ec_query_all(ec_dev);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EPROTO);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ec_dev->proto_version, EC_PROTO_VERSION_UNKNOWN);
> +
> + /* For cros_ec_get_proto_info() without passthru. */
> + {
> + mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_next();
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.version, 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.command, EC_CMD_GET_PROTOCOL_INFO);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.insize,
> + sizeof(struct ec_response_get_protocol_info));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.outsize, 0);
> + }
> +
> + /* For cros_ec_get_proto_info_legacy(). */
> + {
> + mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_next();
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.version, 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.command, EC_CMD_HELLO);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.insize, sizeof(struct ec_response_hello));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.outsize, sizeof(struct ec_params_hello));
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_mkbp(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct cros_ec_proto_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
> @@ -1135,6 +1183,7 @@ static struct kunit_case cros_ec_proto_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_legacy_xfer_error),
> KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_legacy_return_error),
> KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_legacy_data_error),
> + KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_legacy_return0),
> KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_mkbp),
> KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_host_sleep),
> KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_default_wake_mask_return_error),
> --
> 2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists