| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53iZk3U3ZWHj8VBUn2gi1KzFz0ZdxABiZvTPzK=cKu1Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 12:42:32 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
quic_collinsd@...cinc.com, quic_subbaram@...cinc.com,
quic_jprakash@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 7/9] regulator: Add a regulator driver for the PM8008 PMIC
Quoting Satya Priya (2022-06-07 04:50:13)
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-pm8008-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-pm8008-regulator.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..71cb95c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-pm8008-regulator.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2019-2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/qcom_pm8008.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> +
> +#define VSET_STEP_MV 8
> +#define VSET_STEP_UV (VSET_STEP_MV * 1000)
> +
> +#define LDO_ENABLE_REG(base) ((base) + 0x46)
> +#define ENABLE_BIT BIT(7)
> +
> +#define LDO_VSET_LB_REG(base) ((base) + 0x40)
> +
> +#define LDO_STEPPER_CTL_REG(base) ((base) + 0x3b)
> +#define DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_STEPPER_RATE 38400
> +#define STEP_RATE_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> +
> +#define NLDO_MIN_UV 528000
> +#define NLDO_MAX_UV 1504000
> +
> +#define PLDO_MIN_UV 1504000
> +#define PLDO_MAX_UV 3400000
> +
> +struct pm8008_regulator_data {
> + const char *name;
> + const char *supply_name;
> + int min_dropout_uv;
> + const struct linear_range *voltage_range;
> +};
> +
> +struct pm8008_regulator {
> + struct device *dev;
Is this used anywhere?
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct regulator_desc rdesc;
> + u16 base;
> + int step_rate;
> + int voltage_selector;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct linear_range nldo_ranges[] = {
> + REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(528000, 0, 122, 8000),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct linear_range pldo_ranges[] = {
> + REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1504000, 0, 237, 8000),
> +};
> +static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(pldo_ranges) == 1 && ARRAY_SIZE(nldo_ranges) == 1);
Can this static_assert be placed next to the assignment of
n_linear_ranges in probe?
> +
> +static const struct pm8008_regulator_data reg_data[] = {
> + /* name parent headroom_uv voltage_range */
> + { "ldo1", "vdd_l1_l2", 225000, nldo_ranges, },
> + { "ldo2", "vdd_l1_l2", 225000, nldo_ranges, },
> + { "ldo3", "vdd_l3_l4", 300000, pldo_ranges, },
> + { "ldo4", "vdd_l3_l4", 300000, pldo_ranges, },
> + { "ldo5", "vdd_l5", 200000, pldo_ranges, },
> + { "ldo6", "vdd_l6", 200000, pldo_ranges, },
> + { "ldo7", "vdd_l7", 200000, pldo_ranges, },
> +};
> +
> +static int pm8008_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + struct pm8008_regulator *pm8008_reg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + __le16 mV;
> + int rc, uV;
> +
> + regmap_bulk_read(pm8008_reg->regmap,
> + LDO_VSET_LB_REG(pm8008_reg->base), (void *)&mV, 2);
> +
> + uV = le16_to_cpu(mV) * 1000;
> + return (uV - pm8008_reg->rdesc.min_uV) / pm8008_reg->rdesc.uV_step;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int pm8008_write_voltage(struct pm8008_regulator *pm8008_reg,
> + int mV)
> +{
> + __le16 vset_raw;
> +
> + vset_raw = cpu_to_le16(mV);
> +
> + return regmap_bulk_write(pm8008_reg->regmap,
> + LDO_VSET_LB_REG(pm8008_reg->base),
> + (const void *)&vset_raw, sizeof(vset_raw));
> +}
> +
> +static int pm8008_regulator_set_voltage_time(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> + int old_uV, int new_uv)
> +{
> + struct pm8008_regulator *pm8008_reg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> + return DIV_ROUND_UP(abs(new_uv - old_uV), pm8008_reg->step_rate);
> +}
> +
> +static int pm8008_regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> + unsigned int selector)
> +{
> + struct pm8008_regulator *pm8008_reg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + int rc, mV;
> +
> + rc = regulator_list_voltage_linear_range(rdev, selector);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + /* voltage control register is set with voltage in millivolts */
> + mV = DIV_ROUND_UP(rc, 1000);
> +
> + rc = pm8008_write_voltage(pm8008_reg, mV);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + pm8008_reg->voltage_selector = selector;
Is this used anywhere? I think not so remove it and the struct member?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regulator_ops pm8008_regulator_ops = {
> + .enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
> + .disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
> + .is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
> + .set_voltage_sel = pm8008_regulator_set_voltage,
> + .get_voltage_sel = pm8008_regulator_get_voltage,
> + .list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_linear,
> + .set_voltage_time = pm8008_regulator_set_voltage_time,
> +};
> +
> +static int pm8008_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int rc, i;
> + u32 base;
> + unsigned int reg;
> + const char *name;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct regulator_config reg_config = {};
> + struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> + const struct pm8008_data *chip = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> + struct pm8008_regulator *pm8008_reg;
> +
> + pm8008_reg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pm8008_reg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pm8008_reg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pm8008_reg->regmap = pm8008_get_regmap(chip);
> + if (!pm8008_reg->regmap) {
> + dev_err(dev, "parent regmap is missing\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + pm8008_reg->dev = dev;
> +
> + rc = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "regulator-name", &name);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + /* get the required regulator data */
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(reg_data); i++)
> + if (strstr(name, reg_data[i].name))
> + break;
> +
> + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(reg_data)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid regulator name %s\n", name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + rc = of_property_read_u32_index(dev->of_node, "reg", 1, &base);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to get regulator base rc=%d\n", name, rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
> + pm8008_reg->base = base;
> +
> + /* get slew rate */
> + rc = regmap_bulk_read(pm8008_reg->regmap,
> + LDO_STEPPER_CTL_REG(pm8008_reg->base), ®, 1);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to read step rate configuration rc=%d\n", rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
> + reg &= STEP_RATE_MASK;
> + pm8008_reg->step_rate = DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_STEPPER_RATE >> reg;
> +
> + pm8008_reg->rdesc.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
> + pm8008_reg->rdesc.ops = &pm8008_regulator_ops;
> + pm8008_reg->rdesc.name = reg_data[i].name;
> + pm8008_reg->rdesc.supply_name = reg_data[i].supply_name;
> + pm8008_reg->rdesc.of_match = reg_data[i].name;
> + pm8008_reg->rdesc.uV_step = VSET_STEP_UV;
> + pm8008_reg->rdesc.linear_ranges = reg_data[i].voltage_range;
> + pm8008_reg->rdesc.n_linear_ranges = 1;
> +
Ideally the static assert is right here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists