[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKPZnyV==cgadeJpy4NSgGUE3A1zfywMctWVGJRo4Tm7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 17:30:17 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf test: Remove x86 rdpmc test
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 5:29 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:44 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > This test has been superseded by test_stat_user_read in:
> > tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> > The updated test doesn't divide-by-0 when running time of a counter is
> > 0. It also supports ARM64.
>
> Jiri objected to this when I did the same thing[1] as 'perf test'
> doesn't run libperf tests.
NM, I just saw patch 4.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists