[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa6b575dfea7c2131ecfec0f5578d72ca4acfd95.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 13:15:59 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@...ux.ibm.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] mm/demotion: Expose per node memory tier to sysfs
On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 19:12 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
>
> +static struct memory_tier *__node_get_memory_tier(int node)
> +{
> + struct memory_tier *memtier;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
We could need to map node to mem_tier quite often, if we need
to account memory usage at tier level. It will be more efficient
to have a pointer from node (pgdat) to memtier rather
than doing a search through the list.
> + if (node_isset(node, memtier->nodelist))
> + return memtier;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
>
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists