linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.18 809/879] csky: patch_text: Fixup last cpu should be master

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  7 Jun 2022 19:05:27 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.18 809/879] csky: patch_text: Fixup last cpu should be master

From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>

commit 8c4d16471e2babe9bdfe41d6ef724526629696cb upstream.

These patch_text implementations are using stop_machine_cpuslocked
infrastructure with atomic cpu_count. The original idea: When the
master CPU patch_text, the others should wait for it. But current
implementation is using the first CPU as master, which couldn't
guarantee the remaining CPUs are waiting. This patch changes the
last CPU as the master to solve the potential risk.

Fixes: 33e53ae1ce41 ("csky: Add kprobes supported")
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/csky/kernel/probes/kprobes.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/csky/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/csky/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int __kprobes patch_text_cb(void
 	struct csky_insn_patch *param = priv;
 	unsigned int addr = (unsigned int)param->addr;
 
-	if (atomic_inc_return(&param->cpu_count) == 1) {
+	if (atomic_inc_return(&param->cpu_count) == num_online_cpus()) {
 		*(u16 *) addr = cpu_to_le16(param->opcode);
 		dcache_wb_range(addr, addr + 2);
 		atomic_inc(&param->cpu_count);