[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqFvYAlGGWW7ohTZ@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 20:56:16 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] vmscan: Add check_move_unevictable_folios()
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 05:32:34PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 01:07:32AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 08:38:52PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > > Change the guts of check_move_unevictable_pages() over to use folios
> > > and add check_move_unevictable_pages() as a wrapper.
> >
> > The changes here look fine, but please also add patches for converting
> > the two callers (which looks mostly trivial to me).
>
> I do want to get rid of pagevecs entirely, but that conversion isn't
> going to happen in time for the next merge window. for_each_sgt_page()
> is a little intimidating.
for_each_sgt_page, just like other creative scatterlist abuse in the gpu
code is a beast. But, instead of doing a for_each_sgt_page to add
pages to the pagevec and then do a loop over the pagevec to add to
the folio batch it should be pretty trivial to just cut out the
middle man.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists