[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jVapVT-Wz9miJuNYmbpKYNAdydnD-QZTF3vT=2A=+1wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 17:36:29 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
"open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SUBSYSTEM:"
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/16] thunderbolt: ACPI: Use acpi_find_child_by_adr()
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:26 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:54:40PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly
> > in order to find the child matching a given bus address, use
> > acpi_find_child_by_adr() for this purpose.
>
> ...
>
> > if (!adev)
> > return NULL;
>
> Already checked in the below call, IIUC. Hence can be removed.
Yes, it can, will update.
>
> > + return acpi_find_child_by_adr(adev, port->port);
>
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists