[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqIWRnwyqXZppuxN@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 18:48:22 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/16] platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Use
acpi_dev_for_each_child()
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 04:09:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly,
> use acpi_dev_for_each_child() to carry out an action for all of
> the given ACPI device's children.
...
> + rc = acpi_dev_for_each_child(device, tpacpi_evaluate_bcl, NULL);
> + if (rc > 0)
> + return rc;
>
> + return 0;
It can be simply 'return acpi_dev_for_each_child();', no?
AFAICS the caller is prepared for negative returns.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists