[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gOHMezg3YP=g4JG98D-e3roHy7eh8kZwPszGpXZ+Yu4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 17:58:35 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/16] ACPI: container: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child()
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:29 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:58:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly,
> > use acpi_dev_for_each_child() to carry out an action for all of
> > the given ACPI device's children.
>
> ...
>
> > + return acpi_dev_for_each_child(ACPI_COMPANION(&cdev->dev),
> > + check_offline, NULL);
>
> I would find this on one line better and not missing important details after
> 80th character.
I see that you've made similar comments on a few other patches.
I'll change all of them to be one line (longer that 80 chars), but
OTOH there are people who still don't like that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists