[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220609162552.GA514635@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:25:52 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
Cc: "l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"francesco.dolcini@...adex.com" <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks to the
proper places
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 06:20:16AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> > Sent: 2022年6月9日 2:58
> > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > Cc: l.stach@...gutronix.de; bhelgaas@...gle.com; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> > broonie@...nel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; jingoohan1@...il.com;
> > festevam@...il.com; francesco.dolcini@...adex.com;
> > linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kernel@...gutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> > <linux-imx@....com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks to the
> > proper places
> >
> > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 09:47:08AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > To make it more reasonable, move the phy_power_on/phy_init callbacks
> > > to the proper places.
> > > - move the phy_power_on() out of imx6_pcie_clk_enable().
> > > - move the phy_init() out of imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset().
> >
> > I'm not sure what "make it more reasonable" is telling me. In
> > subject line and commit log, please say something more specific
> > than "the proper places."
> >
> > It's probably more important to say where they are moving *to*
> > than where they're moving *out of*.
> Thanks for your comments.
> In another review loop listed below, Lucas used said that it's not
> good to hide PHY init in imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() So, I make a
> try to move the phy_init() out of imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
> And move phy_power_on() out of imx6_pcie_clk_enable() accordingly.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/1646289275-17813-1-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com/
> Okay, I would specific that they are moving *to* later.
>
> > > In order to save power consumption, turn off the clocks and
> > > regulators when the imx6_pcie_host_init() return error.
> >
> > Is the power savings the *reason* for this change? I can't tell
> > from the commit log.
>
> The error handling of the imx6_pcie_host_init() is not mentioned in
> the subject. Should I split these changes into two patches?
If they can be split, they probably should be split.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists