[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7ec7867-453c-f22d-ed1c-b793a5351837@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 14:08:11 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/16] soundwire: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child()
On 6/9/22 12:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:21 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
> <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Shouldn't the return of sdw_acpi_find_one() be trapped, e.g. with
>>>>
>>>> return acpi_dev_for_each_child(parent, sdw_acpi_find_one, bus);
>>>
>>> Sure, I'll do that. Thanks!
>>
>> I also added this EXPORT_SYMBOL to work-around link errors, not sure if
>> this is in your tree already?
>
> One of the previous patches in the series is adding the export.
ok. I ran a bunch of tests with those two changes, so feel free to take
my tags:
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists