[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqJ5OXwAyXvQuC2/@google.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 22:50:33 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] KVM: SEV-ES: reuse advance_sev_es_emulated_ins for
OUT too
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> complete_emulator_pio_in only has to be called by
> complete_sev_es_emulated_ins now; therefore, all that the function does
> now is adjust sev_pio_count and sev_pio_data. Which is the same for
> both IN and OUT.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fd4382602f65..a3651aa74ed7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -13007,6 +13007,12 @@ int kvm_sev_es_mmio_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, unsigned int bytes,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_sev_es_mmio_read);
>
> +static void advance_sev_es_emulated_pio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned count, int size)
> +{
> + vcpu->arch.sev_pio_count -= count;
> + vcpu->arch.sev_pio_data += count * size;
> +}
> +
> static int kvm_sev_es_outs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int size,
> unsigned int port);
>
> @@ -13030,8 +13036,7 @@ static int kvm_sev_es_outs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int size,
> int ret = emulator_pio_out(vcpu, size, port, vcpu->arch.sev_pio_data, count);
>
> /* memcpy done already by emulator_pio_out. */
> - vcpu->arch.sev_pio_count -= count;
> - vcpu->arch.sev_pio_data += count * vcpu->arch.pio.size;
> + advance_sev_es_emulated_pio(vcpu, count, size);
I think this is a bug fix that should go in a separate patch. size == vcpu->arch.pio.size
when kvm_sev_es_outs() is called from complete_sev_es_emulated_outs(), but when
it's called from kvm_sev_es_string_io() it will hold the size of the previous PIO.
> if (!ret)
> break;
>
> @@ -13047,12 +13052,6 @@ static int kvm_sev_es_outs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int size,
> static int kvm_sev_es_ins(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int size,
> unsigned int port);
>
> -static void advance_sev_es_emulated_ins(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned count, int size)
> -{
> - vcpu->arch.sev_pio_count -= count;
> - vcpu->arch.sev_pio_data += count * size;
> -}
> -
> static int complete_sev_es_emulated_ins(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> unsigned count = vcpu->arch.pio.count;
> @@ -13060,7 +13059,7 @@ static int complete_sev_es_emulated_ins(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> int port = vcpu->arch.pio.port;
>
> complete_emulator_pio_in(vcpu, vcpu->arch.sev_pio_data);
> - advance_sev_es_emulated_ins(vcpu, count, size);
> + advance_sev_es_emulated_pio(vcpu, count, size);
> if (vcpu->arch.sev_pio_count)
> return kvm_sev_es_ins(vcpu, size, port);
> return 1;
> @@ -13076,7 +13075,7 @@ static int kvm_sev_es_ins(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int size,
> break;
>
> /* Emulation done by the kernel. */
> - advance_sev_es_emulated_ins(vcpu, count, size);
> + advance_sev_es_emulated_pio(vcpu, count, size);
> if (!vcpu->arch.sev_pio_count)
> return 1;
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists