[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqGDlYGGOvC8rkf6@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:22:29 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@....com>
Cc: jejb@...ux.ibm.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: trusted: Fix memory leak in tpm2_key_encode()
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:21:20AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:17:32PM +0800, Jianglei Nie wrote:
> > tpm2_key_encode() allocates a memory chunk from scratch with kmalloc(),
> > but it is never freed, which leads to a memory leak. Free the memory
> > chunk with kfree() in the return path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@....com>
> > ---
>
> You should write down the changelog ere. No idea what changed
> from the previous version.
>
> > security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c
> > index 0165da386289..8b7ab22950d1 100644
> > --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c
> > +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload,
> > struct trusted_key_options *options,
> > u8 *src, u32 len)
> > {
> > + int err;
>
> Declare as the last local variable (reverse christmas tree order).
>
> Also, I'd use "int ret" since in other functions that is used.
>
> > const int SCRATCH_SIZE = PAGE_SIZE;
> > u8 *scratch = kmalloc(SCRATCH_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > u8 *work = scratch, *work1;
> > @@ -57,8 +58,10 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload,
> > unsigned char bool[3], *w = bool;
> > /* tag 0 is emptyAuth */
> > w = asn1_encode_boolean(w, w + sizeof(bool), true);
> > - if (WARN(IS_ERR(w), "BUG: Boolean failed to encode"))
> > - return PTR_ERR(w);
> > + if (WARN(IS_ERR(w), "BUG: Boolean failed to encode")) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(w);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > work = asn1_encode_tag(work, end_work, 0, bool, w - bool);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -69,8 +72,10 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload,
> > * trigger, so if it does there's something nefarious going on
> > */
> > if (WARN(work - scratch + pub_len + priv_len + 14 > SCRATCH_SIZE,
> > - "BUG: scratch buffer is too small"))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + "BUG: scratch buffer is too small")) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> >
> > work = asn1_encode_integer(work, end_work, options->keyhandle);
> > work = asn1_encode_octet_string(work, end_work, pub, pub_len);
> > @@ -79,10 +84,16 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload,
> > work1 = payload->blob;
> > work1 = asn1_encode_sequence(work1, work1 + sizeof(payload->blob),
> > scratch, work - scratch);
> > - if (WARN(IS_ERR(work1), "BUG: ASN.1 encoder failed"))
> > - return PTR_ERR(work1);
> > + if (WARN(IS_ERR(work1), "BUG: ASN.1 encoder failed")) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
>
> Why you are changing the return value from PTR_ERR(work1
> to -EINVAL?
>
> > + }
> > + kfree(scratch);
> >
> > return work1 - payload->blob;
> > +
> > +out:
>
> Nit:
>
> err:
>
> It's only used for the error path.
>
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
> > struct tpm2_key_context {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> BR, Jarkko
And the patch is also missing fixes tag:
Fixes: f2219745250f ("security: keys: trusted: use ASN.1 TPM2 key format for the blobs")
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists