[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220609052420.GA1452839@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 05:24:22 +0000
From: HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>
To: Guan Jing <guanjing6@...wei.com>
CC: "linmiaohe@...wei.com" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"djwong@...nel.org" <djwong@...nel.org>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com" <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm:fix build error of defined but not used
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 01:00:28PM +0800, Guan Jing wrote:
> If CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set and CONFIG_FS_DAX=y.
> Use command "make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu-" to
> build, will fail:
>
> mm/memory-failure.c:568:13: error: ‘collect_procs_fsdax’ defined
> but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> static void collect_procs_fsdax(struct page *page,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[1]: *** [mm/memory-failure.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [mm] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> so extending "#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAG" to cover
> collect_procs_fsdax() would be a simple resolution.
Thank you for reporting. I think that collect_procs_fsdax() seems to not
depend on hugetlb, so probably mf_dax_kill_procs() should be defined outside
"#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE"?
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Fixes: 143ac5cd7289 ("mm: introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case")
> Signed-off-by: Guan Jing <guanjing6@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 545f402c4890..952f117e4584 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -561,34 +561,6 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
> i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX
> -/*
> - * Collect processes when the error hit a fsdax page.
> - */
> -static void collect_procs_fsdax(struct page *page,
> - struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t pgoff,
> - struct list_head *to_kill)
> -{
> - struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> - struct task_struct *tsk;
> -
> - i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> - for_each_process(tsk) {
> - struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, true);
> -
> - if (!t)
> - continue;
> - vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
> - if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
> - add_to_kill(t, page, pgoff, vma, to_kill);
> - }
> - }
> - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> - i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */
> -
> /*
> * Collect the processes who have the corrupted page mapped to kill.
> */
> @@ -1540,6 +1512,34 @@ static int try_to_split_thp_page(struct page *page, const char *msg)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX
> +/*
> + * Collect processes when the error hit a fsdax page.
> + */
> +static void collect_procs_fsdax(struct page *page,
> + struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t pgoff,
> + struct list_head *to_kill)
> +{
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct task_struct *tsk;
> +
> + i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + for_each_process(tsk) {
> + struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, true);
> +
> + if (!t)
> + continue;
> + vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
> + if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
> + add_to_kill(t, page, pgoff, vma, to_kill);
> + }
> + }
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> + i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */
> +
> /*
> * Called from hugetlb code with hugetlb_lock held.
> *
> --
> 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists