[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a959de1b-c938-0e9f-73a4-89fbeb33cf97@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:16:54 +0530
From: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf expr: Allow exponents on floating point values
Patch looks fine to me
Reviewed-By: Kajol Jain<kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
On 5/27/22 07:36, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Pass the optional exponent component through to strtod that already
> supports it. We already have exponents in ScaleUnit and so this adds
> uniformity.
>
> Reported-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 2 ++
> tools/perf/util/expr.l | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> index d54c5371c6a6..5c0032fe93ae 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
> ret |= test(ctx, "2.2 > 2.2", 0);
> ret |= test(ctx, "2.2 < 1.1", 0);
> ret |= test(ctx, "1.1 > 2.2", 0);
> + ret |= test(ctx, "1.1e10 < 1.1e100", 1);
> + ret |= test(ctx, "1.1e2 > 1.1e-2", 1);
>
> if (ret) {
> expr__ctx_free(ctx);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.l b/tools/perf/util/expr.l
> index 0a13eb20c814..4dc8edbfd9ce 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.l
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.l
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int literal(yyscan_t scanner)
> }
> %}
>
> -number ([0-9]+\.?[0-9]*|[0-9]*\.?[0-9]+)
> +number ([0-9]+\.?[0-9]*|[0-9]*\.?[0-9]+)(e-?[0-9]+)?
>
> sch [-,=]
> spec \\{sch}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists