linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] i2c: npcm7xx: barco-p50-gpio: Add check for platform_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  9 Jun 2022 16:14:09 +0800
From:   Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To:     wsa@...nel.org
Cc:     avifishman70@...il.com, tmaimon77@...il.com, tali.perry1@...il.com,
        venture@...gle.com, yuenn@...gle.com, benjaminfair@...gle.com,
        openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] i2c: npcm7xx: barco-p50-gpio: Add check for platform_driver_register

On Thu, June 9, 2022 at 04:17:11AM +0800, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> As platform_driver_register() could fail, it should be better
>> to deal with the return value in order to maintain the code
>> consisitency.
>> 
>> Fixes: 56a1485b102e ("i2c: npcm7xx: Add Nuvoton NPCM I2C controller driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
> 
> Applied to for-current, thanks! But what is with the "barco-p50-gpio:"
> in the $subject?

Sorry, that's my fault.
The title should be "i2c: npcm7xx: Add check for platform_driver_register".
Need I submit a v2 to change the patch?

Thanks,
Jiang