| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 18:21:37 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
slade@...dewatkins.com, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.17 000/772] 5.17.14-rc1 review
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 19:24, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.14 release.
> > There are 772 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:48:02 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.14-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.17.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>
> Regressions found on qemu_x86_64:
> - kunit/kasan [1]
>
> Regressions found on qemu_i386:
> - kunit/kfence [2]
> - kunit/test_out_of_bounds_read
>
> We will bisect and let you know more details about this reported problem.
The bisect script pointed me to this commit and reverted and tested and
confirmed.
commit 1883088ed4a0d5cc9cea500ca4e89a354ab32c11
Author: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Date: Fri May 27 23:28:18 2022 +0800
md: bcache: check the return value of kzalloc() in detached_dev_do_request()
commit 40f567bbb3b0639d2ec7d1c6ad4b1b018f80cf19 upstream.
The function kzalloc() in detached_dev_do_request() can fail, so its
return value should be checked.
Fixes: bc082a55d25c ("bcache: fix inaccurate io state for detached
bcache devices")
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527152818.27545-4-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
index d15aae6c51c1..673a680240a9 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
@@ -1107,6 +1107,12 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct
bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
* which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl)
*/
ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
+ if (!ddip) {
+ bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
+ bio->bi_end_io(bio);
+ return;
+ }
+
ddip->d = d;
/* Count on the bcache device */
ddip->orig_bdev = orig_bdev;
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> [1] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e/testrun/10038101/suite/kunit/test/kasan/details/
> [2] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e/testrun/10038215/suite/kunit/test/kfence/details/
>
> ## Build
> * kernel: 5.17.14-rc1
> * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
> * git branch: linux-5.17.y
> * git commit: d0f9b2818e1e4d43847e10d6e5310a0c653cb18f
> * git describe: v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e
> * test details:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e
>
> ## Test Regressions (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
> Regressions found on qemu_x86_64:
> - kunit/kasan [1]
>
> Regressions found on qemu_i386:
> - kunit/kfence [2]
> - kunit/test_out_of_bounds_read
>
> ## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
> No metric regressions found.
>
> ## Test Fixes (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
> No test fixes found.
>
> ## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
> No metric fixes found.
>
> ## Test result summary
> total: 134591, pass: 121555, fail: 447, skip: 11730, xfail: 859
>
> ## Build Summary
> * arm: 17 total, 14 passed, 3 failed
> * arm64: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
> * i386: 17 total, 12 passed, 5 failed
> * mips: 4 total, 1 passed, 3 failed
> * parisc: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
> * powerpc: 5 total, 2 passed, 3 failed
> * riscv: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
> * s390: 5 total, 2 passed, 3 failed
> * sh: 2 total, 0 passed, 2 failed
> * sparc: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
> * x86_64: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
>
> ## Test suites summary
> * fwts
> * kunit
> * kvm-unit-tests
> * libgpiod
> * libhugetlbfs
> * log-parser-boot
> * log-parser-test
> * ltp-cap_bounds
> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> * ltp-commands
> * ltp-commands-tests
> * ltp-containers
> * ltp-containers-tests
> * ltp-controllers-tests
> * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
> * ltp-crypto
> * ltp-crypto-tests
> * ltp-cve-tests
> * ltp-dio-tests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> * ltp-filecaps
> * ltp-filecaps-tests
> * ltp-fs
> * ltp-fs-tests
> * ltp-fs_bind
> * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> * ltp-fsx
> * ltp-fsx-tests
> * ltp-hugetlb
> * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> * ltp-io
> * ltp-io-tests
> * ltp-ipc
> * ltp-ipc-tests
> * ltp-math-tests
> * ltp-mm-tests
> * ltp-nptl
> * ltp-nptl-tests
> * ltp-open-posix-tests
> * ltp-pty
> * ltp-pty-tests
> * ltp-sched-tests
> * ltp-securebits
> * ltp-securebits-tests
> * ltp-syscalls-tests
> * ltp-tracing-tests
> * network-basic-tests
> * packetdrill
> * perf
> * rcutorture
> * ssuite
> * v4l2-compliance
> * vdso
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists