[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B392D155-E64C-4EBC-9C6C-4290F637F382@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 06:02:27 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: disable -Warray-bounds
On June 9, 2022 2:56:47 AM PDT, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>Hi Kees,
>
>On Mi, 2022-06-08 at 17:39 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>[...]
>> > See the attached patch for
>> >
>> > (a) make the s390 "use -Wno-array-bounds for gcc-12" be generic
>> >
>> > (b) fix the ipuv3-crtc.c one. IMX people?
>> >
>> > (c) disable -Wdangling-pointer entirely for now
>>
>> I'll take a look; thanks! Should I send them back as a pull request?
>
>Does this refer to the whole patch, including (a) and (b), or am I to
>pick up the ipuv3-crtc.c fix?
Go ahead and grab that one please; that's more "normal" :)
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists