lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dccb5233-7f4f-1be6-d1f4-bbe9f42f88e0@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jun 2022 22:21:44 +0900
From:   Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] docs/doc-guide: Sphinx related updates

Hi all,

This small set of patches fill in a couple of missing info and update
outdated guidelines in doc-guide/sphinx.rst.

Patch 1/5 adds a footnote on expected improvements of images embedded in
PDF documents by the support of Inkscape in kfigure.py added in v5.18.

Patch 2/5 mentions the make variable SPHINXDIRS, which is helpful in
test-building a subset of documents.  This change was inspired by
an earlier comment of Maciej.  He also suggested the update of
changes.rst to indicate the requirement of Sphinx 2.4 or later for
"make htmldocs", but changes.rst is not touched in this patch set
as there is an on-going discussion about updating minimal required
version of Sphinx [1].

[1]: "Sphinx pre v3 -- removing support"
     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/LO3P123MB26810D190462B6BBBF1305F6C2A19@LO3P123MB2681.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/

Patches 3/5 and 4/5 are RFCs.
The guidelines for title adornments were written well before the
transition to subdirectory based documentation.
Here, I'm suggesting a version of guidelines based on my personal
preference.  I am expecting at least a few comments from others
because I don't think there is any consensus on how far these
guidelines should be followed, especially for existing documents.
This update was inspired by private communication with Miguel and
Jon.

Patch 3/5 updates the guidelines for title adornments. The change is
done in-place for ease of review.

Patch 4/5 moves the item expanded by Patch 3/5 from the bullet lists
into its own subsection.

Patch 5/5 is a PoC of adding a meta title to kernel-doc.rst by using
the "title" directive mentioned in Patch 3/5.

Any feedback is welcome!

        Thanks, Akira
--
Akira Yokosawa (5):
  docs/doc-guide: Add footnote on Inkscape for better images in PDF
    documents
  docs/doc-guide: Mention make variable SPHINXDIRS
  docs/doc-guide: Update guidelines for title adornments
  docs/doc-guide: Pull guidelines for title adornments out into
    subsection
  docs/doc-guide: Put meta title for kernel-doc HTML page

 Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst |  2 +
 Documentation/doc-guide/sphinx.rst     | 98 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)


base-commit: f2906aa863381afb0015a9eb7fefad885d4e5a56
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ