[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFbkdV2TCZ38ngMViCHgS_v2vMKVMpJwQBR7nZ0a=z6Vwam2Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 21:23:26 +0800
From: Huichun Feng <foxhoundsk.tw@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
"open list:SCHEDULER" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw>,
Chin-En Lin <shiyn.lin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: avoid redundant hrtimer check
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> 於 2022年6月9日 週四 下午8:29寫道:
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 08:26:12PM +0800, Huichun Feng wrote:
> > The check is required iff HRTICK is enabled and DOUBLE_TICK is disabled,
> > avoid the redundant check by adding corresponding sched_feat() .
>
> How about: 'don't do that then'?
Looks good!
Should I send a v2 for this? Or could you help amend it directly?
Thank you!
Huichun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists