lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fcee522-4dc5-e1b6-6b81-fcc1b8c72f81@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jun 2022 21:51:14 +0800
From:   Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, alexander.shishkin@...el.com,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf x86 evlist: Add default hybrid events for perf
 stat



On 6/9/2022 8:47 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/8/2022 8:04 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 12:31 AM <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Provide a new solution to replace the reverted commit ac2dc29edd21
>>> ("perf stat: Add default hybrid events").
>>>
>>> For the default software attrs, nothing is changed.
>>> For the default hardware attrs, create a new evsel for each hybrid pmu.
>>>
>>> With the new solution, adding a new default attr will not require the
>>> special support for the hybrid platform anymore.
>>>
>>> Also, the "--detailed" is supported on the hybrid platform
>>>
>>> With the patch,
>>>
>>> ./perf stat -a -ddd sleep 1
>>>
>>>   Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>>>
>>>         32,231.06 msec cpu-clock                 #   32.056 CPUs 
>>> utilized
>>>               529      context-switches          #   16.413 /sec
>>>                32      cpu-migrations            #    0.993 /sec
>>>                69      page-faults               #    2.141 /sec
>>>       176,754,151      cpu_core/cycles/          #    5.484 
>>> M/sec          (41.65%)
>>>       161,695,280      cpu_atom/cycles/          #    5.017 
>>> M/sec          (49.92%)
>>>        48,595,992      cpu_core/instructions/    #    1.508 
>>> M/sec          (49.98%)
>>>        32,363,337      cpu_atom/instructions/    #    1.004 
>>> M/sec          (58.26%)
>>>        10,088,639      cpu_core/branches/        #  313.010 
>>> K/sec          (58.31%)
>>>         6,390,582      cpu_atom/branches/        #  198.274 
>>> K/sec          (58.26%)
>>>           846,201      cpu_core/branch-misses/   #   26.254 
>>> K/sec          (66.65%)
>>>           676,477      cpu_atom/branch-misses/   #   20.988 
>>> K/sec          (58.27%)
>>>        14,290,070      cpu_core/L1-dcache-loads/ #  443.363 
>>> K/sec          (66.66%)
>>>         9,983,532      cpu_atom/L1-dcache-loads/ #  309.749 
>>> K/sec          (58.27%)
>>>           740,725      cpu_core/L1-dcache-load-misses/ #   22.982 
>>> K/sec    (66.66%)
>>>   <not supported>      cpu_atom/L1-dcache-load-misses/
>>>           480,441      cpu_core/LLC-loads/       #   14.906 
>>> K/sec          (66.67%)
>>>           326,570      cpu_atom/LLC-loads/       #   10.132 
>>> K/sec          (58.27%)
>>>               329      cpu_core/LLC-load-misses/ #   10.208 
>>> /sec           (66.68%)
>>>                 0      cpu_atom/LLC-load-misses/ #    0.000 
>>> /sec           (58.32%)
>>>   <not supported>      cpu_core/L1-icache-loads/
>>>        21,982,491      cpu_atom/L1-icache-loads/ #  682.028 
>>> K/sec          (58.43%)
>>>         4,493,189      cpu_core/L1-icache-load-misses/ #  139.406 
>>> K/sec    (33.34%)
>>>         4,711,404      cpu_atom/L1-icache-load-misses/ #  146.176 
>>> K/sec    (50.08%)
>>>        13,713,090      cpu_core/dTLB-loads/      #  425.462 
>>> K/sec          (33.34%)
>>>         9,384,727      cpu_atom/dTLB-loads/      #  291.170 
>>> K/sec          (50.08%)
>>>           157,387      cpu_core/dTLB-load-misses/ #    4.883 
>>> K/sec         (33.33%)
>>>           108,328      cpu_atom/dTLB-load-misses/ #    3.361 
>>> K/sec         (50.08%)
>>>   <not supported>      cpu_core/iTLB-loads/
>>>   <not supported>      cpu_atom/iTLB-loads/
>>>            37,655      cpu_core/iTLB-load-misses/ #    1.168 
>>> K/sec         (33.32%)
>>>            61,661      cpu_atom/iTLB-load-misses/ #    1.913 
>>> K/sec         (50.03%)
>>>   <not supported>      cpu_core/L1-dcache-prefetches/
>>>   <not supported>      cpu_atom/L1-dcache-prefetches/
>>>   <not supported>      cpu_core/L1-dcache-prefetch-misses/
>>>   <not supported>      cpu_atom/L1-dcache-prefetch-misses/
>>>
>>>         1.005466919 seconds time elapsed
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>   tools/perf/util/evlist.c          |  2 +-
>>>   tools/perf/util/evlist.h          |  2 ++
>>>   3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c 
>>> b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
>>> index 777bdf182a58..1b3f9e1a2287 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
>>> @@ -4,16 +4,66 @@
>>>   #include "util/evlist.h"
>>>   #include "util/parse-events.h"
>>>   #include "topdown.h"
>>> +#include "util/event.h"
>>> +#include "util/pmu-hybrid.h"
>>>
>>>   #define TOPDOWN_L1_EVENTS      
>>> "{slots,topdown-retiring,topdown-bad-spec,topdown-fe-bound,topdown-be-bound}" 
>>>
>>>   #define TOPDOWN_L2_EVENTS      
>>> "{slots,topdown-retiring,topdown-bad-spec,topdown-fe-bound,topdown-be-bound,topdown-heavy-ops,topdown-br-mispredict,topdown-fetch-lat,topdown-mem-bound}" 
>>>
>>>
>>> +static int ___evlist__add_default_attrs(struct evlist *evlist, 
>>> struct perf_event_attr *attrs, size_t nr_attrs)
>>> +{
>>> +       struct perf_cpu_map *cpus;
>>> +       struct evsel *evsel, *n;
>>> +       struct perf_pmu *pmu;
>>> +       LIST_HEAD(head);
>>> +       size_t i, j = 0;
>>> +
>>> +       for (i = 0; i < nr_attrs; i++)
>>> +               event_attr_init(attrs + i);
>>> +
>>> +       if (!perf_pmu__has_hybrid())
>>> +               return evlist__add_attrs(evlist, attrs, nr_attrs);
>>> +
>>> +       for (i = 0; i < nr_attrs; i++) {
>>> +               if (attrs[i].type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE) {
>>> +                       evsel = evsel__new_idx(attrs + i, 
>>> evlist->core.nr_entries + j);
>>
>> Probably no need to calculate index (j) as it's updated
>> later when it goes to the evlist...
>>
>>
>>> +                       if (evsel == NULL)
>>> +                               goto out_delete_partial_list;
>>> +                       j++;
>>> +                       list_add_tail(&evsel->core.node, &head);
>>> +                       continue;
>>> +               }
>>> +
>>> +               perf_pmu__for_each_hybrid_pmu(pmu) {
>>> +                       evsel = evsel__new_idx(attrs + i, 
>>> evlist->core.nr_entries + j);
>>> +                       if (evsel == NULL)
>>> +                               goto out_delete_partial_list;
>>> +                       j++;
>>> +                       evsel->core.attr.config |= (__u64)pmu->type 
>>> << PERF_PMU_TYPE_SHIFT;
>>> +                       cpus = perf_cpu_map__get(pmu->cpus);
>>> +                       evsel->core.cpus = cpus;
>>> +                       evsel->core.own_cpus = perf_cpu_map__get(cpus);
>>> +                       evsel->pmu_name = strdup(pmu->name);
>>> +                       list_add_tail(&evsel->core.node, &head);
>>> +               }
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>> +       evlist__splice_list_tail(evlist, &head);
>>
>> ... like here.
> 
> Yes, the index of all new evsel will be updated when adding to the evlist.
> 
> Zhengjun, could you please handle the patch? Just set 0 idx for the new 
> evsel should be good enough.
> 
> 
Ok, I will update it in the new version.
> Thanks,
> Kan
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Namhyung
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> +       return 0;
>>> +
>>> +out_delete_partial_list:
>>> +       __evlist__for_each_entry_safe(&head, n, evsel)
>>> +               evsel__delete(evsel);
>>> +       return -1;
>>> +}

-- 
Zhengjun Xing

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ