linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 07/16] ACPI: property: Use acpi_dev_for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1752295.VLH7GnMWUR@kreacher>
Date:   Thu, 09 Jun 2022 15:59:27 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 07/16] ACPI: property: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() for child lookup

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Instead of using the list of children of an ACPI device directly,
use acpi_dev_for_each_child() to find the next child of a given
ACPI device.

This will help to eliminate the children list head from struct
acpi_device as it is redundant and it is used in questionable ways
in some places (in particular, locking is needed for walking the
list pointed to it safely, but it is often missing).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/property.c |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/property.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/property.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/property.c
@@ -1012,6 +1012,22 @@ static int acpi_node_prop_read(const str
 				   propname, proptype, val, nval);
 }
 
+static int stop_on_next(struct acpi_device *adev, void *data)
+{
+	struct acpi_device **ret_p = data;
+
+	if (!*ret_p) {
+		*ret_p = adev;
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	/* Skip until the "previous" object is found. */
+	if (*ret_p == adev)
+		*ret_p = NULL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * acpi_get_next_subnode - Return the next child node handle for a fwnode
  * @fwnode: Firmware node to find the next child node for.
@@ -1020,35 +1036,22 @@ static int acpi_node_prop_read(const str
 struct fwnode_handle *acpi_get_next_subnode(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 					    struct fwnode_handle *child)
 {
-	const struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device_node(fwnode);
-	const struct list_head *head;
-	struct list_head *next;
+	struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device_node(fwnode);
 
 	if ((!child || is_acpi_device_node(child)) && adev) {
-		struct acpi_device *child_adev;
+		struct acpi_device *child_adev = to_acpi_device_node(child);
+
+		acpi_dev_for_each_child(adev, stop_on_next, &child_adev);
+		if (child_adev)
+			return acpi_fwnode_handle(child_adev);
 
-		head = &adev->children;
-		if (list_empty(head))
-			goto nondev;
-
-		if (child) {
-			adev = to_acpi_device_node(child);
-			next = adev->node.next;
-			if (next == head) {
-				child = NULL;
-				goto nondev;
-			}
-			child_adev = list_entry(next, struct acpi_device, node);
-		} else {
-			child_adev = list_first_entry(head, struct acpi_device,
-						      node);
-		}
-		return acpi_fwnode_handle(child_adev);
+		child = NULL;
 	}
 
- nondev:
 	if (!child || is_acpi_data_node(child)) {
 		const struct acpi_data_node *data = to_acpi_data_node(fwnode);
+		const struct list_head *head;
+		struct list_head *next;
 		struct acpi_data_node *dn;
 
 		/*