[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqPO4YhRJq7gTsjV@carbon>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:08:17 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, shakeelb@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
duanxiongchun@...edance.com, longman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec{_irq,
_irqrestore} to lruvec_unlock{_irq, _irqrestore}
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 03:49:10PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> It is weird to use folio_lruvec_lock() variants and unlock_page_lruvec() variants
> together, e.g. locking folio and unlocking page. So rename
> unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} to lruvec_unlock{_irq, _irqrestore}.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Looks nice!
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists