| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <140522b0-6b17-0c11-ace7-a3c3f4606ccb@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:22:55 +0530
From: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
CC: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: davinci: Add support for system suspend/resume PM
Hi Bart,
On 09/06/22 20:05, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 8:08 AM Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>
>>
>> Add support for system suspend/resume PM hooks, save the
>> register context of all the required gpio registers on suspend
>> and restore the context on resume.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> index f960587f86a3..aca352337c46 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>
> The below can stay here but please move the pm_runtime include
> together with the other linux includes.
>
moved this in the respin.
>> #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
>>
>> #define MAX_REGS_BANKS 5
>> @@ -62,6 +63,8 @@ struct davinci_gpio_controller {
>> void __iomem *regs[MAX_REGS_BANKS];
>> int gpio_unbanked;
>> int irqs[MAX_INT_PER_BANK];
>> + struct davinci_gpio_regs context[MAX_REGS_BANKS];
>> + u32 binten_context;
>> };
>>
>> static inline u32 __gpio_mask(unsigned gpio)
>> @@ -622,6 +625,86 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static void davinci_gpio_save_context(struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips,
>> + u32 nbank)
>> +{
>> + struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g = NULL;
>> + struct davinci_gpio_regs *context = NULL;
>> + u32 bank = 0;
>> + void __iomem *base = NULL;
>
> Only initialize variables that need it, please.
>
Removed the intializations in the respin.
Thank you for reviewing the patch. I have posted a respin v2,
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-gpio/patch/20220610054622.21281-1-a-govindraju@ti.com/
Regards,
Aswath
>> +
>> + base = chips->regs[0] - offset_array[0];
>> + chips->binten_context = readl_relaxed(base + BINTEN);
>> +
>> + for (bank = 0; bank < nbank; bank++) {
>> + g = chips->regs[bank];
>> + context = &chips->context[bank];
>> + context->dir = readl_relaxed(&g->dir);
>> + context->set_data = readl_relaxed(&g->set_data);
>> + context->set_rising = readl_relaxed(&g->set_rising);
>> + context->set_falling = readl_relaxed(&g->set_falling);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Clear Bank interrupt enable bit */
>> + writel_relaxed(0, base + BINTEN);
>> +
>> + /* Clear all interrupt status registers */
>> + writel_relaxed(0xFFFFFFFF, &g->intstat);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void davinci_gpio_restore_context(struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips,
>> + u32 nbank)
>> +{
>> + struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g = NULL;
>> + struct davinci_gpio_regs *context = NULL;
>> + u32 bank = 0;
>> + void __iomem *base = NULL;
>> +
>> + base = chips->regs[0] - offset_array[0];
>> +
>> + if (readl_relaxed(base + BINTEN) != chips->binten_context)
>> + writel_relaxed(chips->binten_context, base + BINTEN);
>> +
>> + for (bank = 0; bank < nbank; bank++) {
>> + g = chips->regs[bank];
>> + context = &chips->context[bank];
>> + if (readl_relaxed(&g->dir) != context->dir)
>> + writel_relaxed(context->dir, &g->dir);
>> + if (readl_relaxed(&g->set_data) != context->set_data)
>> + writel_relaxed(context->set_data, &g->set_data);
>> + if (readl_relaxed(&g->set_rising) != context->set_rising)
>> + writel_relaxed(context->set_rising, &g->set_rising);
>> + if (readl_relaxed(&g->set_falling) != context->set_falling)
>> + writel_relaxed(context->set_falling, &g->set_falling);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __maybe_unused davinci_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>> + u32 nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(pdata->ngpio, 32);
>> +
>> + davinci_gpio_save_context(chips, nbank);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __maybe_unused davinci_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>> + u32 nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(pdata->ngpio, 32);
>> +
>> + davinci_gpio_restore_context(chips, nbank);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops davinci_gpio_dev_pm_ops = {
>> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(davinci_gpio_suspend, davinci_gpio_resume)
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct of_device_id davinci_gpio_ids[] = {
>> { .compatible = "ti,keystone-gpio", keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip},
>> { .compatible = "ti,am654-gpio", keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip},
>> @@ -634,6 +717,7 @@ static struct platform_driver davinci_gpio_driver = {
>> .probe = davinci_gpio_probe,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "davinci_gpio",
>> + .pm = &davinci_gpio_dev_pm_ops,
>> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(davinci_gpio_ids),
>> },
>> };
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
> Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists