[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e264ff9-2ada-2413-110e-4105a5aadeae@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:27:42 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Alexander Larsson <alexl@...hat.com>,
Colin Walters <walters@...bum.org>,
Alberto Ruiz <aruiz@...hat.com>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Chung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@...ology.com>,
Christian Kellner <ckellner@...hat.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolin@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] fat: add renameat2 RENAME_EXCHANGE flag support
On 6/10/22 05:17, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com> writes:
>
>>>
>>> Looks like unnecessary complex (and comparing raw i_mode, not S_ISDIR(),
>>> better to change before make dir dirty). How about this change, it is
>>> only tested slightly though? Can you review and test?
>>>
>>
>> Your change looks good to me and indeed the logic is simpler than in mine.
>>
>> I've also tested it and AFAICT it works correctly as well. Do you plan to
>> squash this or should I respin a new revision of the whole patch-set ? If
>> you want to post it as a follow-up I'm also OK with that.
>
> Could you merge to your patchset, and re-send?
>
Sure thing, I'll do that.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists