[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000001d87ca2$3ac0f520$b042df60$@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:15:21 +0900
From: "Chanho Park" <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
To: "'Alim Akhtar'" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -next] phy: samsung-ufs: fix NULL pointer dereference
> Subject: [PATCH -next] phy: samsung-ufs: fix NULL pointer dereference
>
> commit f86c1d0a58b1f63a ("phy: samsung: ufs: remove drvdata from struct
> samsung_ufs_phy")
>
> removes _drvdata_ initialization which resulting in NULL pointer
> dereferencing in samsung_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(). Fix this by
> initializing drvdata.
>
> The said commit also duplicate "has_symbol_clk" both in drvdata struct and
> in samsung_ufs_phy struct, let's go back and use only one "has_symbol_clk".
>
> Fixes: f86c1d0a58b1 phy: samsung: ufs: remove drvdata from struct
> samsung_ufs_phy
This might be conflicted when you apply your patch.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20220610072924.12362-3-alim.akhtar@samsung.com/T/#u
When I created my patch, it was not existing so my previous patch make sense.
If you get back drvdata for your patch, please drop this "fixes tag + patch" and put this in your patchset.
Best Regards,
Chanho Park
Powered by blists - more mailing lists