linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 6/6] ufs: host: ufs-exynos: add support for fsd ufs hci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <004301d87ca5$296850e0$7c38f2a0$@samsung.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:36:21 +0900
From:   "Chanho Park" <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
To:     "'Alim Akhtar'" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:     <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        <avri.altman@....com>, <bvanassche@....org>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
        "'Bharat Uppal'" <bharat.uppal@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 6/6] ufs: host: ufs-exynos: add support for fsd ufs
 hci

> Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] ufs: host: ufs-exynos: add support for fsd ufs hci
> 
> Adds support of UFS HCI which is found in Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD)
> SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Uppal <bharat.uppal@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.h |   1 +
>  2 files changed, 141 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c
> index cc128aff8871..19068605d9fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@ enum {
>  #define UNIPRO_DME_PWR_REQ_REMOTEL2TIMER1	0x0A8
>  #define UNIPRO_DME_PWR_REQ_REMOTEL2TIMER2	0x0AC
> 
> +#define DME_POWERMODE_REQ_REMOTEL2TIMER0	0x78B8
> +#define DME_POWERMODE_REQ_REMOTEL2TIMER1	0x78BC
> +#define DME_POWERMODE_REQ_REMOTEL2TIMER2	0x78C0

They look mismatch naming with previous definitions.
UNIPRO_DME_POWERMODE_*

Best Regards,
Chanho Park