[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <381ff739-e898-8812-d549-df7101f0eaa2@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:55:53 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>
Cc: Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>,
Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@...ian.com>,
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/20] dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for
NPCM8XX
On 10/06/2022 00:05, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Sorry, but I thought the fix is only to add an explanation to the
> dt-binding file as was done in V2.
>
> The NPCM8XX binding is done in the same way as the NPCM7XX and both
> use the same reset driver and use the same reset method in upstreamed
> NPCM reset driver.
>
> Can you please explain again what you suggest to do?
If you want abstract IDs, they must be abstract, so not representing
hardware registers. Then they start at 1 and are incremented by 1.
Other option is to skip such IDs entirely and use register
offsets/addresses directly, like Arnd suggested in linked documents. I
think he expressed it clearly, so please read his answers which I linked
in previous discussion.
There is no single reason to store register addresses/values/offsets as
binding headers. These are not bindings.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists