[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h74sn54g.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 13:13:19 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: uvcvideo: Fix spurious DMA max segment size warnings
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:57:40 +0200,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 12:18:30PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Takashi,
> >
> > (CC'ing Greg and the linux-usb mailing list)
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:22:46AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > As default, the DMA max segment size is set to 64k, and uvcvideo may
> > > overflow that size easily, resulting in a warning like:
> > >
> > > DMA-API: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: mapping sg segment longer than device claims to support [len=98304] [max=65536]
> > >
> > > Explicitly set up the DMA max segment size for avoiding spurious kernel
> > > warnings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> > > index 1b4cc934109e..25aa6e6a6906 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> > > @@ -2160,6 +2160,8 @@ int uvc_video_init(struct uvc_streaming *stream)
> > > for_each_uvc_urb(uvc_urb, stream)
> > > INIT_WORK(&uvc_urb->work, uvc_video_copy_data_work);
> > >
> > > + dma_set_max_seg_size(uvc_stream_to_dmadev(stream), UINT_MAX);
> > > +
> >
> > uvc_stream_to_dmadev() returns the pointer to the HCD's struct device,
> > which is shared between all drivers on the bus. Is it really fine for a
> > USB device driver to change the maximum segment size of the HCD device
> > directly ?
>
> Ick, no! That feels wrong, it should only change things for that one
> specific device, not all devices on that bus.
Hrm, indeed, that points to the HCD. This made me wonder, though,
whether the current usage of dma_*sgtable() with that device is OK or
not. The warning came from that code path, after all...
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists