[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13240249.uLZWGnKmhe@alexbook>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 14:50:18 +0200
From: "Alejandro T." <atafalla@...on.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/sysreg: Fix typo in Enum element regex
On viernes, 10 de junio de 2022 13:19:50 (CEST) Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:15:04AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:42:18PM +0200, Alejandro Tafalla wrote:
> > > In the awk script, there was a typo with the comparison operator when
> > > checking if the matched pattern is inside an Enum block.
> > > This prevented the generation of the whole sysreg-defs.h header.
> > >
> > > -/0b[01]+/ && block = "Enum" {
> > > +/0b[01]+/ && block == "Enum" {
> >
> > This makes sense but I'm surprised that we haven't noticed it until now
> > (maybe some awk versions treat it as a relational operator).
>
> What Catlain said - if we weren't generating the full header contents
> I'd expect things to fail to build normally, but it's entirely possible
> this is just happening to work with some implementations and the patch
> is clearly correct.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Hi Mark, thanks for your review.
Indeed, I'm building the kernel in Alpine, which uses Busybox instead of gawk.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists