[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3246ffaf0a15bff2d8a9568ed73967d07dd414b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:27:03 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
briannorris@...omium.org, amitkarwar@...il.com,
ganapathi017@...il.com, sharvari.harisangam@....com,
huxinming820@...il.com, kvalo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Remove useless param of devcoredump functions
and fix bugs
On Fri, 2022-06-10 at 15:24 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 11:26:24AM +0800, Duoming Zhou wrote:
> > The first patch removes the extra gfp_t param of dev_coredumpv()
> > and dev_coredumpm().
> >
> > The second patch fix sleep in atomic context bugs of mwifiex
> > caused by dev_coredumpv().
> >
> > Duoming Zhou (2):
> > devcoredump: remove the useless gfp_t parameter in dev_coredumpv and
> > dev_coredumpm
> > mwifiex: fix sleep in atomic context bugs caused by dev_coredumpv
>
> Did you forget to cc: everyone on patch 2?
>
Don't think so? I got it, and you're listed there too, afaict.
That said, it's actually entirely independent from patch 1, and patch 2
should probably even be Cc stable.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists